Monday, August 27, 2007

The train towards our current dilemma of mediocrity and a mentality that abhors progress started in 1957 when the progressive camp of Nigerians asked for independence. The North opposed it for primordial reasons and as a consequence delayed independence for another 3 years. Since then, the line between the progressives who favour radical revolutionary change and those who prefer the unprogressive status quo has increasingly become manifest. Professor Chukwuma Soludo is no doubt a victim of the unprogressive camp, that has historically abhorred ambition, creativity and change. This same group has ensured by blocking any move towards true federalism, that the rest of Nigeria continues at their own pace

Nigeria presents a challenge which only a dynamic, determined, courageous, and progressive thinker can solve. But sectional ethnic interests which has remained in conflict with each other has continued to muzzle any such dynamic individuals geared towards radical change. It has resulted in mediocrity, and encouraged the resort to witch hunting those who ordinarily would be celebrated in other climes. It would thus be difficult to separate the ongoing Professor Chukwuma Soludo saga from the politics of a sectional interest group and political cabal. Professor Soludo is Nigeria’s equivalent of the legendary Alan Greenspan, America‘s erstwhile and very successful Governor of the Bank of America. Against a massive campaign by interest groups determined to maintain the status quo, he courageously oversaw the recapitalization of Banks which ended an era of weak and frequently failing banks engaged in “corporate 419” as they frequently made off with depositors funds.

He also among other critical reforms, re-organised the Nigerian security printing and minting which for the first time in its history succeeded in printing all currency locally. The sum total of his banking reforms has heralded an era of unbelievable confidence in the financial sector which has created an unprecedented boom in stocks and shares and stabilised the exchange rates of the Naira against other international currencies. His style of leadership has brought a professionalism, talent and creativity rarely seen in our clime.

His recent announcement of a strategic agenda for the Naira which proposes to bring the Naira at par with the dollar, has predictably brought out all shades and manner of vultures ready to sink their talons into the heart of an acknowledged progressive thinker and reformer. Some of them have in the process sought to remind us, in a bid to destroy his legacy out of both jealousy and sectional witch hunting, that neither the recapitalization nor the currency redenomination are originally his ideas. Isn’t it revealing that those who opposed both the recapitalization and proposed redenomination are now telling us the ideas are not originally his? No doubt because they loath the success of the recapitalization and are afraid of the potential success of the redenomination exercise. This indeed is enough proof of their intentions

Nigerians have never lacked any ideas on how to effect positive change and move the nation forward. What has always lacked is the political will and courage to implement them. In the same vein, the banking reforms necessary to overhaul the banking system was never a secret, what lacked as always was someone with the professionalism, courage and zeal to damn the odds and carry it through and professor Soludo happened to be that man.

Professor Soludo is human and could have made mistakes, but that cannot and should not take away the fact that he is a daring, committed and determined professional who has worked tirelessly for the benefit of an ungrateful nation. What i see in the present attempts to rubbish and humiliate him for daring to propose bold new initiatives for the Naira is the same penchant that has seen us destroying achievers and exalting mediocrity which has contributed in grounding us in perpetual poverty.

The consequences of Nigeria’s penchant for rubbishing talent and professionalism would result in increasing brain drain, and discourage those who have positive ideas from initiating them. It is a safe bet, that the interest groups on Soludo’s trail are already preparing someone from their ethnic group to take his job, not out of merit, but out of a tragic ethnic rat race, and primitive quest for domination which is responsible for the legacy of Nigeria’s historical misrule and arrested development.







Tuesday, August 21, 2007


Rioting broke out yesterday in the northern Greek port of Thessaloniki as Nigerians, mainly young demonstrators, confronted the Police in that country after the death of a Nigerian immigrant.Greek television showed footage of dozens of smashed windows and several damaged cars. Police said the victim, whose name has not been made public, had been selling CDs and DVDs illegally, and that he jumped from the first floor of a cafeteria to escape a police inspection. His injuries were fatal and he died on the spot.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007


The potential role of the tourism sector as a major instrument for socio-economic development cannot be overemphasized. These potentials cannot be realised unless our numerous tourist attractions are well developed, packed and promoted, with diligent attention to security and welfare of visitors. Nigeria Tourism Official web site is set to serve as the mouth piece of stakeholders in the pushing for positive changes in this all-important sector. You are therefore, invited to be part of this exciting development

Beauty in Diversity

Besides the many natural features of Nigeria, the cultural assets of the nation are of universal recognition. The richness and diversity of the Nigerian culture is a manifestation of the socio-cultural differences of the over 250 ethnic groups that inhabit the land for ages. These, couple with hospitality of the over 110 million people, make Nigeria one of the richly endowed potential tourist destinations in the globe.
No matter your interest, Nigeria has something for you to explore. From sandy beaches, pepper-soups, unspoilt wild-life parks to addictive Afro-beats music; it is unforgetable experience.


Nigeria has abundant physical attractions ranging from hills, waterfalls, springs, lakes and mountains across the lenght and breadth of the Country.

These have been created by ingenuity of Nigerians to provide relaxtion. Examples include Obudu Ranch, Whispering Palms, Gembu Resort, Chammah Park and Rayfield Resort.

The cultural assests of Nigeria are among the most fascinating in Africa, some of which include the Eyo in Lagos, Osun Oshogbo and Durbar.

Save the commemorative postal stamps that were unveiled by the Centre for Black African Arts and Civilisation (CBAAC) in collaboration with the Nigeria Postal Services (NIPOST), the 30th anniversary of Africa’s biggest cultural fiesta went unsung. Perhaps, the declining fortunes of the national theatre and the uncertainty surrounding its current status were responsible for the low-key ceremony.
However, the reasons that caused the declining fortunes of the theatre ought to be fully appreciated in order to see how best this national patrimony could be salvaged. For more than 15 years, the theatre’s structure has been in decay due largely to official neglect and the failure to follow the recommendations of the Bulgarian designers regarding the cooling system, water supply and guarding against erosion within the expansive complex. Inadequacy of funds and official ineptitude prevented the theatre from being run as prescribed by its designers.
Consequently, the roof started leaking, the central cooling system broke down, a part of the basement started sinking, the bridge linking the Ijora highway caved in. Since 1992 after the disastrous screening of Aiye, the popular film by the late Hubert Ogunde, in which two people died in a stampede to gain entry, the 2,500-seater main hall has remained virtually abandoned. Power failure often shuts down activities and keeps the glow off the crown of the theatre, which was designed to resemble a soldier’s cap. In essence, the national theatre has been a monument in decline.
The bitter reality is that in its present state of decay, the national theatre serves no purpose to the nation’s image or the arts community. If capable private investors are seen to have emerged out of a transparent bidding exercise, with verifiable asset base, it will be counterproductive not to allow the national theatre a new lease of life.
A lifeline beyond the purview of government is an appropriate step to rescue the monument from further decay. The glaring neglect over the years has demonstrated that the government is unwilling to preserve the complex for its symbolic value as a national heritage that should not be treated as a profit-making enterprise. The salvation of the national theatre, therefore, lies in the hands of competent private

Monday, August 06, 2007


Former Governor of Bayelsa state, Diepreye Alamiyeseigha ought by now to have gone down in history as the first Governor in Nigeria's Fourth Republic to be sentenced to jail on the grounds of corrupt practices. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment, by the court of Justice Mohammed Shuaibu of the Federal High Court of Lagos, following a protracted trial and his admission of guilt in a 25-count charge. The judge also ordered the forfeiture of six of his companies, eleven houses at home and abroad and sums of money totalling about N600 million.

But because the embattled Governor had already served out the term of his imprisonment in EFCC custody, he is already a free man. Under normal circumstances, Alamiyeseigha, who before now had jumped bail in England in a money laundering case - he says the British authorities organized his escape, and those ones are diplomatically silent (!), should be generally promoted and cited across Nigeria as a persona non grata, as a man who has fallen from grace to grass, as a living symbol of the fate that awaits corrupt leaders and a living lesson to all serving Governors and public officials.

But here in Nigeria, Alamiyeseigha's trial and conviction have ended up as a farce and a sorry anti-climax. Whatever moral lesson that should be learnt from his trial and humiliation have been blunted by various attempts to glorify him. Since his release from prison custody, he has been treated like a hero. Concerned Bayelsans have had to raise funds for his treatment abroad in a curious show of support and solidarity. Spritualists reportedly organised thanksgiving prayer sessions to celebrate his return from prison while well-wishers besieged his home in Ikeja, GRA, Lagos, to pay homage. Alami is now on his way back to Dubai where the authorities only a few weeks ago, diplomatically shoehorned him out of their hospitals, not wanting to be seen to be supporting a discredited Nigerian leader. The former Governor has also been received in audience by President Umaru Yar'Adua at the Presidential Villa in Abuja where he reportedly was recruited as a kind of Honorary Special Adviser to the Federal Government on Niger Delta matters.
It is not impossible that a Presidential jet was sent to Lagos to take Alamiyeseigha to Abuja, and that he traveled to the Villa in a Presidential convoy. He must have walked majestically on the grounds of the Presidential Villa, decked out in his Niger Delta regalia, complete with cap and walking stick, and resource control swagger, had quality audience with the President, enjoyed the pleasure of Presidential lunch.
This is the same man who only a week earlier was at the mercy of prison warders at the Ikoyi prison and EFCC officials who treated him like a common criminal. The court found him guilty of using public funds to set up companies and a property portfolio, collecting kickbacks from contractors, and using his position to amass odious wealth. A week later, the same man was being treated by both the Presidency and a section of the public as if he was a prisoner of conscience and a victim of the Nigerian state. He has even been called the man with the solution to the Niger Delta crisis.
From EFCC custody to the Presidential Villa as guest and Honorary Adviser, former Governor Alamiyeseigha must be feeling triumphant. He does not feel that he has been disgraced, and when he says he is a victim of the machinations of the Obasanjo government, he gets a good audience. This development is most unfortunate. It deals a big blow to whatever positive signal may have been represented by his conviction in court. The work of the court of Justice Mohammed Shuaibu has been short-circuited by politicians acting outside the court of law. When the President holds audience with a convicted man, with such a historically significant burden, and receives him with so much ceremony, he is unwittingly rubbishing the cause of justice.
Don't doubt this: the day Alamiyeseigha returns to Bayelsa, there will be dancing in the streets from Yenagoa to Wilberforce Island, congratulatory messages in the media, a 21-gun salute by the combined forces of ethnic militants and kidnappers of the Niger Delta., and the media so complicit in this matter will report it all with relish and flourish. This is the sad thing about our country: on every score, in every matter, we find it so expedient to strike the recursive note.
The indecent act of men of the Nigerian Police was freely displayed last week at Maryland bus stop in ikeja lAGOS.

The police at Maryland are fond of waiting to see any young man with a flashy car driving they will suddenly carry there guns to point at the car , sometimes they chase these unsuspecting drivers with a desperate measure of calculation that one will think they have caught a criminal.

I happeneed to witness these particular case on friday when a young guy was driving a flashy sports car, and the police stopped him for a search.They searched and found out that his papers were compleate and no offense was traced to him or his car.

But the manner at wish they displayed there guns numbering about 10 policemen just to stop a car was disgracing and embarassing.

Please the Police in Maryland should be more professional in there conduct.


Monday, July 30, 2007


As Nigeria battles to shed a reputation for corruption, the recent statement, "All Nigerians are Corrupt Regardless of Level” mischievously attributed to Ms. Oprah Winfrey, though sad, is a case in point for soul searching in Nigeria. The bad publicity about some ex-governors currently being convicted for graft has further exacerbated the looting and corruption problems. Nigeria is again brought in the world’s glaring spotlight, not for discoveries, not for attempting to solve Africa’s problems, not for development but for perfecting real or apparent corruption.


Can a nation be branded a haven for thieves without a reason? Will such a nation not have a legal recourse to fight and remove the appellation if she has no semblance of rogues within her citizens? It is my understanding that Ms Winfrey mentioned the Nigerian fraudsters as part of the global discussion on scams. The accusation by Ms. Winfrey, if false, is a slap in the face for all honest and law abiding Nigerians at home and in Diaspora but, if true, is an opportunity for Nigeria as a viable, law abiding nation to be contrite and embark on real soul searching. But when can a nation be referred to as a den of thieves and it sticks?

The issue is not that Ms. Winfrey made the statement but why on earth will she make a disparagingly blanket statement Nigeria and indirectly black people? There are over 140 million Nigerians, how many of these citizens duped Ms. Winfrey to justify her statement? I am going to go out of my way to saying there is no smoke without fire. What must have prompted Ms. Winfrey to make such an indefatigable statement? Did Oprah just wake up on the wrong side of the bed and decided to just pick any country to accuse of being den of thieves? Why did the name Nigeria pop up in her head? Was Ms. Winfrey temporarily insane when she made the statement? Could she have experienced negative activities of some Nigerian citizens? Was Ms. Winfrey speaking from a statistical point of view or does she have list of Nigerians that she can claim to have stolen from her? Or was Ms. Winfrey tired of the accusation of corruption being levied on African nations by white media that she thought it was better for a black person to accuse and hence stop the moral hemorrhage?

Those that see Nigeria’s potential as a great nation and have been willing to contribute their quotas to her development ought to weep for HER IN the way she has been carrying on for the past 47 years. How does one fight corruption and end up being benefactor of corruption after leaving office? How can a nation, the laws, and leaders have capacity to punish 419 when they too are basking in corruption? There would be no moral justification to go after anyone that is corrupt, or is engaged in 419. It is time for the nation and her citizens to shed the last tear in their glands, roll up their sleeves, fight real corruption because if not, our nation would unravel like a pack of yawn. Presently, Nigeria is a nation of zombies and the land of the hopeless. We protect corrupt leaders from our conclave and chastise those that are not from our tribes or those we are not helping to launder money. A thief is a thief is a thief no matter where they come from. It is my believe that when corruption is conquered, the best of Nigeria will ooze out, there will be a reverse brain drain, and peace and tranquility will be pervasive in the land of the living again.

Friday, July 27, 2007


Out of all the nominees for minister, only Bode Augusto failed to make it. He was too “arrogant”. That word sounds too familiar to any Lagosian. It is a word used to disguise a form of discrimination perpetrated on Lagosians for ages. In this case, there is even a better reason: people in his home State were against him. Even though it was clear that those who signed petition against Bode Augusto did not meet the minimal requirement for a petition to the House. In other words, their names and addresses were not known in Lagos. They were sent by career politicians who are natives of Lagos.
During the time of Abacha, some people were called cowards for not fielding a candidate for President. When they were reminded that Tunji Braithwaite a prominent man came out boldly as a candidate, the funny joke was: A Lagosian? Who will take you seriously?
Now, this is a respectable, educated and an activist by any universal standard. Yet, his candidacy was a joke to some who never achieved half of this man’s sweat. It was a joke to the rest of the Country, but not to Lagosians.
It used to be that they were not educated enough, they like fancy clothes, cars and girls. You can not even marry their girls. That is why some always send for their wives from home. Go to anywhere in Nigeria you will find the same people with those faults but in the case of Lagosians, they turn them into poster boys. It has been used to deny many Lagos natives who paid their dearly dues respectable status in life. But I do not really think other Nigerians realize it as a form of discrimination. One can still discriminate without realizing it; it is the impact and consequences on the victims that count.
Some of us who went to secondary schools outside Lagos faced so many stereotypes, as we were supposed to be able to fight with the worst instruments in those days, which was a broken bottle. They expected us to brag with everything but also empty headed. The only comfort was that their girls loved us. It could be the bad boy syndrome. As many of us defied some of these stereotypes, they would doubt if we were from Lagos.
There was a senior boy I still remember very well who would announce class by class that every junior boy from Lagos must come by his bed after 9.30 pm study period to kneel down and put our hands up for no reason. He did not care if your parents were from there but lived in Lagos or if you were Lagos native, as some students tried to dissociate from us to avoid punishments.
My first year outside Nigeria, I registered at the university where I met some Nigerians who came the same year. They were surprised to see me in school. I was supposed to be in my mustang chasing girls all over the town. I had the last laugh and I always remind them today that contrary to their predictions that I would be lost, it is some of them who never made it back home to live. One of them used to boast that his children were going to live in his village. If he could not live there, I had wondered how his children were going to find their ways there.
A few years ago, the Governor of the State was not from Lagos, leader of the Senate was not from Lagos, the Chief Justice was not from Lagos and the Head of Service in the Ministry was not from Lagos. There should be something somebody from Lagos could qualify for, didn’t you think so? Even when the Chief Judge was given a list of qualified lawyers, he said he was looking for merit irrespective of State of origin. Who would take that from him in his own State?
There is no State in the whole of Nigeria where Awolowo is more popular, alive or in death than Lagos. When Obasanjo was looking for someone to fill a slot for Lagos, he got the name of Awolowo’s son as an ambassador. Haba, nobody qualified from Lagos? We were cheated in spite of our love for Awo and his family. But they are not from Lagos.
Yet of all places in Nigeria, Lagos is the most accommodating place to live. As we used to say in Lagos, if a stranger enters Lagos today, he or she would be fed and clothed before the end of that day. So we expect most Nigerians to love us in return. Actually many do. If they do not know you, they know or might have gone to school with a member of our families.
Luckily, most of these stereotypes are nothing more. That is why it kills me when people in their matured age still use childish behavior to reflect their deep prejudice against us. Even some friends can not understand why I was so pissed by the arrogant aspersion cast on humble Bode Augusto. You see, they can not understand. It’s a Lagos thing.
Of course some Lagosians are guilty of some of these things but so are many others. It is a form of prejudice to typecast those from Lagos for something we all do. It is really frustrating to subject a man out of many to questioning for over two hours answering every question brilliantly and getting praised later for his knowledge only to deny him based on frivolous excuses. It is like going for a job interview, as some can relate, only to be told after all praises about your qualifications; that you are over qualified.
It does not make a difference to me personally whether Bode Augusto got to be a minister or not. None of my friends who were in position of power could come out and say I have ever asked them for anything but fair is fair. Nigerians even have this reluctance of asking those younger than them for anything. So if I never asked my friends of about the same age, I can not hope for asking Bode Augusto. I just think that he was cheated and short-changed for being OmoEko. Anyone else with such dazzling performance during the process could have been easily confirmed.
No hard feelings.

Thursday, July 26, 2007

President Umaru Yar'Adua today (Thursday) in Abuja swore in 39 ministers, ending weeks of speculation by Nigerians. The ministers, who had been screened by the Senate, were also assigned portfolios.
The former Head of Service of the Federation, Alhaji Yayale Ahmed, was assigned the defence portfolio while former CBN Deputy Governor, Shamsudeen Usman was named minister of finance.
The nominee from Lagos was not cleared by the Senate while nominees from Kaduna and Taraba are yet to be screened.
Below is a complete list of the ministers and their portfolios:
Ministry/Portfolio Name
1. Attorney-General/Minister of Justice: Mr Michael Aondoakaa (SAN)
2. Agriculture/Water Resources: Abba Sayyadi Ruma
3. Agriculture/Water Resources: Adamu Maina Waziri (State 1)
4. Commerce/Industry: Chief Charles Ugwu
5. Commerce/Industry (State): Ahmed Garba Bichi
6. Culture/Tourism: Adetokunbo Kayode
7. Culture/Tourism (State): Aliyu Idi Hong
8. Defence: Yayale Ahmed
9. Defence (State): Mrs Fidelia Njeze
10. Education: Igwe Aja-Nwachukwu
11. Education (State 1): Agada Anthony Jerry
12. Education (State 2): Mrs Aishatu Jibril Dukku
13. Energy (State): Power Mrs Fatima Ibrahim
14. Energy (State) Petroleum: Henry Odein Ajumogobia


15. Energy (State) Gas: Odusina Emmanuel
16. Environment/Housing: Mrs Halima Alao
17. FCT: Dr Aliyu Modibbo Umar
18. FCT (State): Sen. John Akpanudoedehe
19. Finance: Dr Shamsuddeen Usman
20. Finance (State): Aderemi Babalola
21. Foreign Affairs: Ojo Maduekwe
22. Foreign Affairs (State 1): Tijjani yahaya Kaura
23. Foreign Affairs (State 2): Amb. Bagudu Hirse
24. Health: Prof. Adenike Grange
25. Health (State): Gabriel Aduku
26. Information/Communication: John Odey
27. Information/Communication (State): Ibrahim Nakande
28. Interior: Maj.-Gen. Godwin Abbe (Rtd)
29. Interior (State): Hassan Alhaji Haruna
30. Labour: Dr Hassan Lawal
31. Mines/Steel Development: Chief Sarafa Tunji Isola
32. Mines/Steel Development (State): Ahmed Moh'd Gusau
33. Transportation: Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke
34. Transportation (State): John Okechukwu Emeka
35. Science/Technology: Mrs Grace Ekpiwhre
36. Youth Development: Sen. Akinlabi Olasunkanm
i37. Women Affairs: Saudatu Usman Bungudu
38. Minister/Deputy Chairman National Planning Commission: Sen. Sanusi Daggash
39. Minister/Chairman, National Sports Commission: Abdulrahman Gimba
The Police in Lagos have constituted themselves to be a nuisance.Because i don't know why police will always stop you and check you form your pockets to your wallets to find something they themselves do not know.The police are just using every means to extort money from people on the Lagos island.At CMS Bus stop yesterday, i saw For policement ranscaking a bag from a young man, they found International Passport and other travel documents.They eventually arrested the man , but hewas pleading that the documents are his.The wort scenario was the Handcuffing of this man, he was slapped severally for protesting.Another case happened last week in Obalende area of ikoyi near Dodan barracks, Police men from Lion building stormed into Daniel's Compund and molested and humiliated operators of business cerntres in the compound.A police warrant of arrest was shown but it showed the address of some where else.The men of the Nigerian Police arrested over ten customers and owners of the business centres.They were hndcuffed and thoroughly beaten.There offense could not be ascertained as that then.The disgrace and shame has had its first casualty , as one of the owners of a buiness centre has stopped operations.The police i gathered took a bribe of 40,000 thousand Naira.Efforts shopuld be made to make the Poice force a career ,The police in Lagos are dangerous, they are capable of inrlicting harm in the face of of protests.I love the police but there are many illiterates and criminals in their fold. please purge the police so they can defend and protect us.

Monday, June 25, 2007

The notion of mentoring is ancient. The original Mentor was described by Homer as the "wise and trusted counselor" whom Odysseus left in charge of his household during his travels. Athena, in the guise of Mentor, became the guardian and teacher of Odysseus' son Telemachus.
In modern times, the concept of mentoring has found application in virtually every forum of learning. In academics, mentor is often used synonymously with faculty adviser. A fundamental difference between mentoring and advising is more than advising; mentoring is a personal, as well as, professional relationship. An adviser might or might not be a mentor, depending on the quality of the relationship. A mentoring relationship develops over an extended period, during which a student's needs and the nature of the relationship tend to change. A mentor will try to be aware of these changes and vary the degree and type of attention, help, advice, information, and encouragement that he or she provides.
In the broad sense intended here, a mentor is someone who takes a special interest in helping another person develop into a successful professional. Some students, particularly those working in large laboratories and institutions, find it difficult to develop a close relationship with their faculty adviser or laboratory director. They might have to find their mentor elsewhere—perhaps a fellow student, another faculty member, a wise friend, or another person with experience who offers continuing guidance and support.

The nature of a mentoring relationship varies with the level and activities of both student and mentor. In general, however, each relationship must be based on a common goal: to advance the educational and personal growth of the student. You as mentor can also benefit enormously.
There is no single formula for good mentoring; mentoring styles and activities are as varied as human relationships. Different students will require different amounts and kinds of attention, advice, information, and encouragement. Some students will feel comfortable approaching their mentors; others will be shy, intimidated, or reluctant to seek help. A good mentor is approachable and available.
Often students will not know what questions to ask, what information they need, or what their options are (especially when applying to graduate programs). A good mentor can lessen such confusion by getting to know students and being familiar with the kinds of suggestions and information that can be useful.
In long-term relationships, friendships form naturally; students can gradually become colleagues. At the same time, strive as a mentor to be aware of the distinction between friendship and favoritism. You might need to remind a student—and yourself—that you need a degree of objectivity in giving fair grades and evaluations. If you are unsure whether a relationship is "too personal," you are probably not alone. Consult with the department chair, your own mentor, or others you trust. You might have to increase the mentor-student distance.
Students, for their part, need to understand the professional pressures and time constraints faced by their mentors and not view them as merely a means—or impediment—to their goal. For many faculty, mentoring is not their primary responsibility; in fact, time spent with students can be time taken from their own research. Students are obliged to recognize the multiple demands on a mentor's time.
At the same time, effective mentoring need not always require large amounts of time. An experienced, perceptive mentor can provide great help in just a few minutes by making the right suggestion or asking the right question. This section seeks to describe the mentoring relationship by listing several aspects of good mentoring practice.
Careful listening. A good mentor is a good listener. Hear exactly what the student is trying to tell you—without first interpreting or judging. Pay attention to the "subtext" and undertones of the student's words, including tone, attitude, and body language. When you think you have understood a point, it might be helpful to repeat it to the student and ask whether you have understood correctly. Through careful listening, you convey your empathy for the student and your understanding of a student's challenges. When a student feels this empathy, the way is open for clear communication and more-effective mentoring.
Keeping in touch. The amount of attention that a mentor gives will vary widely. A student who is doing well might require only "check-ins" or brief meetings. Another student might have continuing difficulties and require several formal meetings a week; one or two students might occupy most of an adviser's mentoring time. Try through regular contact—daily, if possible—to keep all your students on the "radar screen" to anticipate problems before they become serious. Don't assume that the only students who need help are those who ask for it. Even a student who is doing well could need an occasional, serious conversation. One way to increase your awareness of important student issues and develop rapport is to work with student organizations and initiatives. This will also increase your accessibility to students.
Multiple mentors. No mentor can know everything a given student might need to learn in order to succeed. Everyone benefits from multiple mentors of diverse talents, ages, and personalities. No one benefits when a mentor is too "possessive" of a student.

Sometimes a mentoring team works best. For example, if you are a faculty member advising a physics student who would like to work in the private sector, you might encourage him or her to find mentors in industry as well. A non-Hispanic faculty member advising a Hispanic student might form an advising team that includes a Hispanic faculty member in a related discipline. Other appropriate mentors could include other students, more-advanced postdoctoral associates, and other faculty in the same or other fields. A good place to find additional mentors is in the disciplinary societies, where students can meet scientists, engineers, and students from their own or other institutions at different stages of development.
Coordinate activities with other mentors. For example, a group of mentors might be able to hire an outside speaker or consultant whom you could not afford on your own.
Building networks. You can be a powerful ally for students by helping them build their network of contacts and potential mentors. Advise them to begin with you, other faculty acquaintances, and off-campus people met through jobs, internships, or chapter meetings of professional societies. Building a professional network is a lifelong process that can be crucial in finding a satisfying position and career.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Nigerian Diplomat Caught in India


A senior Nigerian diplomat was reportedly caught by Indian authorities on Monday as he was trying to board a flight from New Delhi to Lagos with $2.27 million (about N300 million) in cash in his possession.

The diplomat, Defence Adviser to the Nigerian High Commissioner in India, Captain G.A. Ojedokun, was reportedly caught when Indian Airlines staff members handling baggage on the early morning shift at the Indira Gandhi International Airport were alerted by the X-ray images of the contents of his bag.

It was reported that when Ojedokun was questioned concerning their findings, he tried to deceive the airline employees.

His case was later transferred to income tax officials, who seized the money from him.
An Indian tax department spokesman, A.K. Sinha, told the Associated Press (AP) yesterday that “the diplomat did not explain where the cash came from.”

He said when the tax department seized the money and handed Ojedokun to the country’s External Affairs Ministry, he had to be released on account of the immunity he enjoyed.
“The Income Tax department seized the cash, but released the diplomat after informing the External Affairs Ministry,” Sinha said.

AP also reported the ministry as confirming the report. The ministry was quoted to have said in a statement that Ojedokun was to leave New Delhi for Lagos by an Ethiopian Airline flight yesterday.

“He disclosed that he was carrying nearly $1.5 million in his check-in baggage,” the statement was quoted to have said, adding that a search by Indian tax officials resulted in “the seizure of $2.27 million in cash from his person and baggage.
ATLANTA — A judge sentenced a man to life in prison for raping his own daughter in a cemetery.
The man, whose name is being withheld to protect the identity of the victim, was convicted of the March 10, 2006, incident on Friday. Just days after his daughter's 16th birthday, the man took her to a graveyard and told her to lie down.
"You're know you're old enough to date boys now," he told her. "I'm about to break you in."
He took out a condom and raped her, and he later brought her back to the cemetery and sodomized her, Fulton County prosecutor Kimberly Esmond Adams said.
The jury did not convict him on the sodomy charge. With prior convictions for drug and weapon charges, the man was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus 20 years, for rape and incest.
During the sentence hearing Friday, the daughter sobbed as she spoke to her father for the first time in a year: "I got so depressed that I wanted to kill myself. How could someone I trust to protect me and I knew all my life do something as evil and dirty as this?"

Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter told the man he has no sympathy for him.
"You did this to your daughter twice once in the graveyard and then again in the courtroom," Baxter said.
Obasanjo: A Failed Statesman

Finally, the verdict of history beckons on President Obasanjo. As a man out of time, he once said he didn’t want to be popular while secretly coveting popularity particularly at other levels. He may not fully realise how unpopular he has become locally and internationally in the last three years of his administration until perhaps next Tuesday when his tenure ends. But for a nation notoriously noted for being short of heroes since the death of the famous leading nationalists of yore, we may have been condemned to another era of long wait for a national political icon. What ideally should have been an occasion for a worthy tribute, celebrations, homage and praises has instead turned into a season of dirges, regrets, tribulations and recriminations. And whatever his media and palace salesmen may say, Obasanjo is leaving the Presidency most disliked by people and a leadership failure. It is a dislike that cuts across generations; the depth I realized recently at two unrelated events. One at home and the other abroad. About three weeks ago, I had been invited as Chairman to the Valedictory Ceremony of one of the 38 schools in Lagos which my ministry in conjunction with the New Era Foundation of the Lagos First Lady has successfully developed an Advocacy Programme on Sanitation and Conservation in the last two years. The SS3 students would soon be leaving school and it was better to do the Valedictory before their final examinations. It was an occasion meant for prize giving to deserving students and speech- making on careers and counseling. The most interesting part of the programme was when 30 out of 121 graduating students were selected to speak about leadership, what they think it means, and which leaders in history have inspired them most. I became more interested in who their inspirational leaders were. Sixteen out of the 30 student speakers chose former Southern African President Nelson Mandela, 6 chose former American President Bill Clinton, and 2 would like to be like billionaire Bill Gates, and 2 girls chose Director-General of National Agency for Food and Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC) Dora Akinyuli while the rest fluctuated between Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka and former labour leader and Gubernatorial Candidate of Action Congress (AC) in Edo State Adams Oshiomhole. I instantly became curious. I wanted to find out more, particularly why no Nigerian political leader both present and past was chosen. I referred them to Awolowo, Ahmadu Bello, Zik, and Aminu Kano among others, but they looked blank, as they knew little or nothing about the exploits of these past national heroes, a question mark on some contents of our school curriculum. I then came to the present and the first person I mentioned was President Obasanjo. I had not even finished pronouncing his name when a thunderous NO! filled the air as if I had committed an abomination. Curiously, I explored further as to why no single student chose his or her President. It was then I realised how our future generation has lost so much faith in the system. Individually, many preferred to go for further studies abroad. They have no hope of what the future has in stock for them. Many lamented about their senior brothers and sisters who had left University but can't find jobs and are still living on handouts from parents at home. Lack of electricity and high cost of living are the realities they confront daily and they felt the present Federal Government has failed to inspire hope in their future. Indeed, it was an experience worth revisiting in another one year or two to see if things have changed for the better. Then last week, I was in New York to represent the Lagos State Governor, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, at a C40 Cities Climate Change Summit organised by the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone in partnership with President Clinton Foundation. It was a conference that brought 40 Mega Cities of the world together being the most active in terms of environmental degradation. Only Lagos, Cairo and Johannesburg so qualified in Africa. It was a Summit that brought together the world's biggest cities' Governors and Mayors with President Clinton, Mayor Bloomberg of New York and Mayor Ken Livingstone of London. I had attended with Yemi Cardoso, Lagos State former Commissioner for Economic Planning and Budget and now the Chairman of our World Bank Project on Urban Renewal and Environment, Lagos State Metropolitan Development and Governance Project (LMDGP), the General Manager, Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA) and our Director of Ecology and Conservation in the Ministry. Introducing ourselves as the Lagos delegation was enough to arouse discussions on Nigeria particularly the last general elections. For many particularly the South Africans, Americans and Europeans, President Obasanjo has been a big disappointment given the hopes that they thought his inauguration in 1999 gave the world. Some who had visited Nigeria recently have been disappointed particularly at the poor state of infrastructure in the country as well as the government's human rights record and the inability to provide level playing field within the political space. For some, it was the last elections they felt so sad about. Yet some were disappointed that given the amount of resources Nigeria has and the democratic experiment of the last eight years, Nigeria ought to be the leading light in Africa. It was lamentation and Obasanjo to them has become another episode in Africa's litany of failed leadership. You needed to listen to some mayors and Governors during private discussions to really understand how Obasanjo has lost it including his previously well-known international reputation. I offered no defence and I could not have either, having being part of a government, which has been at the receiving end of Obasanjo's high handedness. In New York, I felt that if I were in the presidency, I would have recommended a refund of all monies spent by the Federal Government on public relations to burnish Obasanjo government's image by the likes of Andrew Young and Carl Masters. Beyond all the sentiments, however, there is need to make a critical examination of a leadership that held so much hope only to end up as a big disappointment. When the Military in 1999 anointed Obasanjo as its successor and next civilian president, those of us who had our doubts about his suitability given his antecedents were soon bought over within his first two years in office when his initial steps pointed towards a brighter future for the country. As a journalist, I was one of those who fought against his impeachment by the National Assembly, a fact I have since regretted. Obasanjo was already a statesman before becoming the President. The statesmanship in him propelled him in taking some good steps in his first two years; thereafter he lost it and allowed the African political disease to overwhelm him. The pursuance of his political enemies then became one of the primary objects of his administration. Apart from this, the outgoing President has one basic flaw-lack of vision. He is one man who has so much passion for the country yet he confuses this with vision. Vision requires broadmindedness, ability to see what others cannot see, tapping opportunities when they are present, creating synergy between resources and competent personnel, and meticulous planning. Great leaders in history have both. Love of one's country helps to propel vision. But if you have the former and lack the latter, you would only end up like a doctor who said the operation was successful but the patient died. Inability to see the bigger picture has been the hallmark of his government in the last eight years. Instead of seeing Nigeria on a large scale, he got consumed with mundane matters like competing with governors, local chiefs and career politicians over small issues. This explains why he works so hard with passion morning and night and junketing from one part of the country to the other, yet no improvement in the lives of his people. When he took over in 1999, the challenges facing him were quite well defined given the right vision. These were first, the civilian control of the military, fundamental reform and restructuring of the economy, security of life and property, provision and re-development of basic infrastructure to cope with the challenges of modern economy, combating mass unemployment and lastly building viable and enduring democratic institutions that would also have dealt with the larger issue of corruption. These were the issues arising from the long years of military misrule, but Obasanjo largely failed to put these issues in clear perspective and failed woefully at responding to them. Modern government secures confidence of the people if it fulfils the first basic law of governance: that is security of life and property. The experience of the last four years is that life has never been so short, brutish and unsafe in almost every part of Nigeria. When a president encourages lawlessness and subversion of other levels of government as we have seen in Oyo and Anambra, it only says how much the quality of national leadership has sunk. It is a disgrace, that in a nation seeking foreign investments, its police stations are always thrown into darkness at night with only kerosene lanterns to the rescue. While many Nigerians cities are short of enough policemen to combat crime, some of the president's cronies that thrive by telling him lies about his enemies at night go about with as many as 12 policemen as personal escorts and we claim to be running a transparent and fair government. Modern economy thrives on heavy investment in basic infrastructure such as roads, railways, electricity, information technology and security as we have learnt from Roosevelt in United States, Lee Kuan Yan in Singapore and General Park in South Korea. In eight years, this President cannot boast of a single new highway. We thought that by keeping money in external reserves, we were saving for the raining day and cultivating our creditors, when in fact we had set the economy back by another 10 years due to lack of investment in infrastructure and had also lost opportunity to create millions of jobs. It is part of the lack of vision that we failed to tap the opportunity provided in 1999 when Governor Bola Tinubu introduced IPP on electricity in year 2000, which was well frustrated only for the same government to turn to same IPP at its twilight. Our economy today resembles that of Russia otherwise called KGB economy where the Oligarchs backed by the state have taken full control. In our own case, we can best describe it as a Transcorp economy. It is an economy that favours few while killing the small and medium scale industries, the real engine of growth. Sadly, when the history of this era is finally written, it would definitely be devoid of any elements of statesmanship at a time when a long-suffering nation needed one.
Obasanjo: A Failed Statesman

Finally, the verdict of history beckons on President Obasanjo. As a man out of time, he once said he didn’t want to be popular while secretly coveting popularity particularly at other levels. He may not fully realise how unpopular he has become locally and internationally in the last three years of his administration until perhaps next Tuesday when his tenure ends. But for a nation notoriously noted for being short of heroes since the death of the famous leading nationalists of yore, we may have been condemned to another era of long wait for a national political icon. What ideally should have been an occasion for a worthy tribute, celebrations, homage and praises has instead turned into a season of dirges, regrets, tribulations and recriminations. And whatever his media and palace salesmen may say, Obasanjo is leaving the Presidency most disliked by people and a leadership failure. It is a dislike that cuts across generations; the depth I realized recently at two unrelated events. One at home and the other abroad. About three weeks ago, I had been invited as Chairman to the Valedictory Ceremony of one of the 38 schools in Lagos which my ministry in conjunction with the New Era Foundation of the Lagos First Lady has successfully developed an Advocacy Programme on Sanitation and Conservation in the last two years. The SS3 students would soon be leaving school and it was better to do the Valedictory before their final examinations. It was an occasion meant for prize giving to deserving students and speech- making on careers and counseling. The most interesting part of the programme was when 30 out of 121 graduating students were selected to speak about leadership, what they think it means, and which leaders in history have inspired them most. I became more interested in who their inspirational leaders were. Sixteen out of the 30 student speakers chose former Southern African President Nelson Mandela, 6 chose former American President Bill Clinton, and 2 would like to be like billionaire Bill Gates, and 2 girls chose Director-General of National Agency for Food and Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC) Dora Akinyuli while the rest fluctuated between Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka and former labour leader and Gubernatorial Candidate of Action Congress (AC) in Edo State Adams Oshiomhole. I instantly became curious. I wanted to find out more, particularly why no Nigerian political leader both present and past was chosen. I referred them to Awolowo, Ahmadu Bello, Zik, and Aminu Kano among others, but they looked blank, as they knew little or nothing about the exploits of these past national heroes, a question mark on some contents of our school curriculum. I then came to the present and the first person I mentioned was President Obasanjo. I had not even finished pronouncing his name when a thunderous NO! filled the air as if I had committed an abomination. Curiously, I explored further as to why no single student chose his or her President. It was then I realised how our future generation has lost so much faith in the system. Individually, many preferred to go for further studies abroad. They have no hope of what the future has in stock for them. Many lamented about their senior brothers and sisters who had left University but can't find jobs and are still living on handouts from parents at home. Lack of electricity and high cost of living are the realities they confront daily and they felt the present Federal Government has failed to inspire hope in their future. Indeed, it was an experience worth revisiting in another one year or two to see if things have changed for the better. Then last week, I was in New York to represent the Lagos State Governor, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, at a C40 Cities Climate Change Summit organised by the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone in partnership with President Clinton Foundation. It was a conference that brought 40 Mega Cities of the world together being the most active in terms of environmental degradation. Only Lagos, Cairo and Johannesburg so qualified in Africa. It was a Summit that brought together the world's biggest cities' Governors and Mayors with President Clinton, Mayor Bloomberg of New York and Mayor Ken Livingstone of London. I had attended with Yemi Cardoso, Lagos State former Commissioner for Economic Planning and Budget and now the Chairman of our World Bank Project on Urban Renewal and Environment, Lagos State Metropolitan Development and Governance Project (LMDGP), the General Manager, Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA) and our Director of Ecology and Conservation in the Ministry. Introducing ourselves as the Lagos delegation was enough to arouse discussions on Nigeria particularly the last general elections. For many particularly the South Africans, Americans and Europeans, President Obasanjo has been a big disappointment given the hopes that they thought his inauguration in 1999 gave the world. Some who had visited Nigeria recently have been disappointed particularly at the poor state of infrastructure in the country as well as the government's human rights record and the inability to provide level playing field within the political space. For some, it was the last elections they felt so sad about. Yet some were disappointed that given the amount of resources Nigeria has and the democratic experiment of the last eight years, Nigeria ought to be the leading light in Africa. It was lamentation and Obasanjo to them has become another episode in Africa's litany of failed leadership. You needed to listen to some mayors and Governors during private discussions to really understand how Obasanjo has lost it including his previously well-known international reputation. I offered no defence and I could not have either, having being part of a government, which has been at the receiving end of Obasanjo's high handedness. In New York, I felt that if I were in the presidency, I would have recommended a refund of all monies spent by the Federal Government on public relations to burnish Obasanjo government's image by the likes of Andrew Young and Carl Masters. Beyond all the sentiments, however, there is need to make a critical examination of a leadership that held so much hope only to end up as a big disappointment. When the Military in 1999 anointed Obasanjo as its successor and next civilian president, those of us who had our doubts about his suitability given his antecedents were soon bought over within his first two years in office when his initial steps pointed towards a brighter future for the country. As a journalist, I was one of those who fought against his impeachment by the National Assembly, a fact I have since regretted. Obasanjo was already a statesman before becoming the President. The statesmanship in him propelled him in taking some good steps in his first two years; thereafter he lost it and allowed the African political disease to overwhelm him. The pursuance of his political enemies then became one of the primary objects of his administration. Apart from this, the outgoing President has one basic flaw-lack of vision. He is one man who has so much passion for the country yet he confuses this with vision. Vision requires broadmindedness, ability to see what others cannot see, tapping opportunities when they are present, creating synergy between resources and competent personnel, and meticulous planning. Great leaders in history have both. Love of one's country helps to propel vision. But if you have the former and lack the latter, you would only end up like a doctor who said the operation was successful but the patient died. Inability to see the bigger picture has been the hallmark of his government in the last eight years. Instead of seeing Nigeria on a large scale, he got consumed with mundane matters like competing with governors, local chiefs and career politicians over small issues. This explains why he works so hard with passion morning and night and junketing from one part of the country to the other, yet no improvement in the lives of his people. When he took over in 1999, the challenges facing him were quite well defined given the right vision. These were first, the civilian control of the military, fundamental reform and restructuring of the economy, security of life and property, provision and re-development of basic infrastructure to cope with the challenges of modern economy, combating mass unemployment and lastly building viable and enduring democratic institutions that would also have dealt with the larger issue of corruption. These were the issues arising from the long years of military misrule, but Obasanjo largely failed to put these issues in clear perspective and failed woefully at responding to them. Modern government secures confidence of the people if it fulfils the first basic law of governance: that is security of life and property. The experience of the last four years is that life has never been so short, brutish and unsafe in almost every part of Nigeria. When a president encourages lawlessness and subversion of other levels of government as we have seen in Oyo and Anambra, it only says how much the quality of national leadership has sunk. It is a disgrace, that in a nation seeking foreign investments, its police stations are always thrown into darkness at night with only kerosene lanterns to the rescue. While many Nigerians cities are short of enough policemen to combat crime, some of the president's cronies that thrive by telling him lies about his enemies at night go about with as many as 12 policemen as personal escorts and we claim to be running a transparent and fair government. Modern economy thrives on heavy investment in basic infrastructure such as roads, railways, electricity, information technology and security as we have learnt from Roosevelt in United States, Lee Kuan Yan in Singapore and General Park in South Korea. In eight years, this President cannot boast of a single new highway. We thought that by keeping money in external reserves, we were saving for the raining day and cultivating our creditors, when in fact we had set the economy back by another 10 years due to lack of investment in infrastructure and had also lost opportunity to create millions of jobs. It is part of the lack of vision that we failed to tap the opportunity provided in 1999 when Governor Bola Tinubu introduced IPP on electricity in year 2000, which was well frustrated only for the same government to turn to same IPP at its twilight. Our economy today resembles that of Russia otherwise called KGB economy where the Oligarchs backed by the state have taken full control. In our own case, we can best describe it as a Transcorp economy. It is an economy that favours few while killing the small and medium scale industries, the real engine of growth. Sadly, when the history of this era is finally written, it would definitely be devoid of any elements of statesmanship at a time when a long-suffering nation needed one.
Way to True Sportsmanship


If the hype of British tabloids is to be believed, I was one of the estimated one billion TV viewers in 160 countries that watched the English FA Cup final last Saturday between Chelsea and Manchester United at Wembley Stadium. Although not a Manchester United fan, I was a little bit disappointed that Chelsea won. I was disappointed partly because as a lover of beauty and skill, I did not want Chelsea’s power and directness to vanquish Manchester United’s attractive attacking playing style. I was equally disappointed partly because I, like most Arsenal fans, always wished that Chelsea got a heavy spanking whenever they are playing irrespective of whether their defeat would in any way affect the fortunes of Arsenal. I believe I started wishing Chelsea lost every match since Jose Mourinho took over the team and turned Arsenal’s traditional “wife”, as we describe a weaker side in this part of the world, into a formidable and unbeatable machine for my darling team. Despite people like me, Chelsea always managed to grind out victory after victory even when they play very badly. They did that again on Saturday although the match lacked the expected thrills and chills of an FA Cup final between the two best teams in England.Nonetheless, the FA Cup final was a fitting way to bring to an end the 2006/2007football session in England. For it has been a long session of excitement and disappointment, of victories and defeats, of injuries and good health, of fair play and foul, of improvisation and organisation, of tactical brilliance and sheer incompetence, and of youth and experience. Although football is a game, its conduct is akin to war, perhaps because it has become a huge global business driven by men with big ego. And as in war, everything appears fair on and off the football pitch as long as victory is achieved. That is why some players would dive and roll on the ground at the slightest touch. That is why some others would wrestle and push and box and slap and tackle viciously. That is equally why coaches would shout and jump and kick and curse and punch and wail. The beauty of this game is that there is no lasting personal enmity between the players or the coaches or the teams, despite the anger and bitterness and tension and contestations and rivalry on the field of play. After the victory and defeat at the end of a match, after the emergence of the winner and the loser at the end of the session, every team returns to the drawing board to plan for the next match or strategise for the next session. The winner would want to consolidate and the loser would want to win next time. That is why almost every team in the Premiership, particularly the tops ones, are already planning for next session, identifying players to be acquired to strengthen their squad. In a way politics could be likened to a football tournament, with elections akin to a soccer match. It is particularly so in Nigeria where participants in the political game would do anything to win at the polls. That was why there was intimidation and violence and bribery and ballot stuffing and disappearance of ballot boxes in the just concluded elections. It is similar to all the bad tackles and diving and playacting on the football field. Just as there are incompetent or inexperienced referees who would not penalise a violent tackle or disallow an offside goal or who could easily be conned by a diving striker or intimidated by a star player; there are also incompetent and corrupt electoral officials who may either be blind to the snatching of ballot boxes or close their eyes to ballot stuffing. However no matter the irregularities on the field of play in a football match, neither players nor coaches nor club owners call for the cancellation of a concluded match. All they do is take cases of irregularities to the FA whose disciplinary panel thereafter sanctions players, coaches and teams in accordance with its rules and in proportion to the offences committed. Participants in our political game are yet to adopt this the way they have borrowed from the violence and cheating during the run of play. That is why opposition elements would call for the cancellation of the elections, the formation of an interim government and the conduct of fresh polls. At the end of a meeting in Abuja Tuesday last week, opposition parties including the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) and the Action Congress (AC) resolved that none of those who won in the April 14 and 21 elections should be sworn in on May 29. They rather demanded the formation of an interim government which would be given “reasonable time” to organise fresh elections. Spokesman of the opposition, Dr. Tunji Braithwaite (Was he a candidate in the elections?) said, “There will be no inauguration anywhere in Nigeria with the overwhelming documentation of electoral fraud, loss of lives and complicity by electoral and employed “ad-hoc” officials.”It is curious that opposition parties supposedly fighting for democracy do not have faith in democratic processes. The constitution and electoral law are very clear on how those who are dissatisfied with the outcome of any election could seek redress. Election tribunals are part of the electoral process. It is strange that those who say they are better qualified to manage the affairs of this country do not believe in the very institutions put in place to make democracy work. The judiciary is one such institution and despite its problems and shortcomings, it has by and large stabilised the nation’s democracy in the last eight years. After the 2003 polls for instance, the election tribunals reversed some results, the notable one being the victory of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Anambra State where Dr. Chris Ngige lost the governorship to Dr. Peter Obi of All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA). The judiciary also voided the impeachment of Governors Rasheed Ladoja (Oyo), Obi and Joshua Dariye (Plateau). In the multiple legal battles between President Olusegun Obasanjo and Vice president Atiku Abubakar, the latter won many of the cases including the declaration of his seat vacant and his disqualification to contest the presidential elections.If the judiciary has been courageous in dispensing justice without fear or favour, why are the opposition parties shy of taking their cases to the election tribunals? If the April 14 and 21 polls were worse than the 2003 elections as the opposition parties have collectively argued, isn’t that an indication there are likely to be more reversals at the tribunals particularly since the opposition claim they have “overwhelming documentation of electoral fraud”? Shouldn’t they go and overwhelm the tribunals with such documentation rather than call for interim government? Isn’t the very idea of interim government in the circumstance extra-constitutional and therefore akin to a coup? Section 1(2) of the 1999 Constitution says “The Federal Republic of Nigeria shall not be governed, nor shall any person or group of persons take control of the government of Nigeria or any part thereof, except in accordance with the provisions of this constitution.” How will the credible citizens that would constitute this interim government be formed and who will be the appointing authority? How will that government have constitutional legitimacy to “within a reasonable time” organise a free and fair election for the country in the light of the above constitutional provision? Have the opposition parties forgotten a similar interim government we had not too long ago and its outcome?Fraudulent as the elections may be, there is no way forward in an interim government of whatever kind. Let all those who are aggrieved go to the tribunals and prove their case. Those who cannot should immediately begin to plan for the elections of 2011. That is the way to true sportsmanship.

Saturday, May 19, 2007

The beauty of Democracy is, when an electoral illegality is believed to have been committed, it can only be overturn by a legal or constitutional means. Despite the fact that, the process that led to the emergence of Umaru Musa Yar’adua as Nigeria’s President-elect was dented by gross irregularities and widespread rejection of the election results, Yar’adua is Nigeria’s President-elect as declared by ‘almighty’ INEC, until it is decided otherwise by a competent court of law.
Of recent, the political atmosphere of Nigeria was clouded by two burning political issues: the call for power shift by the North, and the call for resource control by the South–South, these two ‘regionally-coloured’ political issues have so much overwhelmed the political system of Nigeria to the extend that, they have successfully influenced the permutations in the politics of the country- a typical example is the Yar’adua–Goodluck presidential ticket presented by the ruling PDP; Yar’adua to satisfied the power shift agitation in the north, Goodluck to pacify the Niger Delta. But one interesting question is, is the concession of the vice presidential slot to the Niger Delta going to calm down the agitations in the Niger Delta? Certainly not, it will only answer the problem of the region at the political front, which is merely a quarter of the problem in the Niger Delta. The recent bombing of Goodluck’s country home by militants, have certainly sent a clear signal to those in authority that, the bulk of the problem in the Niger Delta is socioeconomic; which is also the main problem of the entire Nigerian state.
Oil, which is the key sustainer of the economy of the Nigerian state, is also the main factor that contributed to her crocodile-phase development. The discovery of Oil in Nigeria has brought laziness in the larger society- the complete neglect of agriculture which was hitherto the main source of revenue for the nation, hence, the stifling of creativity in revenue-generation especially at states and local government levels, degradation of the environment in the oil producing communities , corruption among the political class, uncontrolled spending spree by governments, and stunted growth in industrialization, all because of the easy money oil provides. Due to the huge earnings in oil, coupled with some period of oil booms and windfalls, the management and distribution of this huge amount of petrodollars to the benefits of the entire Nigerian populaces has become painstaking, Herculean and sensitive issue, which entails the employing of complex technicalities and formulae in the re-distribution of the oil revenues. The management and distribution of oil revenues has raised many questions and debates both in political and economic tunes, one of them-the Resource Control struggle.
Proponent of Resource Control argued that, the current system had distorted fiscal federalism, rendered the Niger Delta poor, and they believe the introduction of some criteria in the sharing formula was a veiled attempt at favouring other parts of Nigeria above the oil producing areas, thus, they argued, the need for Resources Control. Moreover, these proponents of resource control see the issue within three prisms; ‘Absolute’ resources control, ‘Relative’ Resource Control or, an upward increase in the 13% derivation index. Absolute’ resources control imply that all states take full control of the mining and sales of resources on their land, keep the bulk of the revenue accruable from the resources, but give “pocket money” to the centre, while relative resources control imply that, the status qua on the sharing formular be maintain but states will be in charge of awarding the lucrative oil blocks and choosing which oil company will be allowed to explore for oil. The third type of resource control, calls for an upward review of the 13% derivation index to something around 50% or above.
Opponents of resources control are of the view, a happy-go-lucky tempering of the re-distribution mechanism of oil revenues would facilitated the disintegration of the Nigerian state, and a state that controls or retain the kind of money derivable from oil, can easily declare independence and become a country of it own. Allowing states to allocate oil blocks will promote animosities between communities in the Niger Delta, because it would be a controversial issue, as who will be responsible for the allocation of the oil blocks will be a contentious issue; is it the state government? Is it the government local government? Is it the communities or the clans? Or is it the local chiefs? These horny issues will raise its heads, because the Niger Delta is made of different ethnic groups, and there is disconnection of the leadership from the citizenry, rather than generate healthier competition in development; absolute resource control will only end in generating tension among communities in the Niger Delta.
Another point raised by opponents of resource control is, resource control may distort the Nigerian social order- if all the oil revenues go to the Niger Delta region, the region will witness an unprecedented influx of Nigerians from all the corners of the country- thus, the beginning of another social crisis.
Nevertheless, between these diverging thoughts, opinions and suggestion on resources control, there is always a middle-line approach, which most Nigerian governments try to adopt, but it has failed woefully, because of the lack of genuine political will for constructive engagement with the real and grassroots stakeholders in the Niger Delta, who have been pushed to the wall and this had made the youth in that area crisis citizens, majority of them never experienced a normal national political life in the political setting called Nigeria .
Nigeria needs a bold measure to rehabilitate these promising citizens to a healthy and productive life. The major leeway is to produce a desirable environment for negotiation with the real and grassroots stakeholders in the Niger Delta, who are the problem owners, give more concessions, including more sacrifice by the Nigerian state, which is a hard measure, but very necessary, this will diffuse tension, sanitise the environment and win the support of majority of Niger Delta masses who are the real and true stakeholders. However, the Niger Delta people should be aware; they will be safer and well-off in the greater Nigeria.
English is well on its way to becoming the dominant global language. Is this a good thing? Yes, in fields such as science where a common language brings efficiency gains. But the global dominance of the English language is bad news for world literature, according to CEPR researcher Jacques Mélitz (Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique, Paris and CEPR). Why? Because if the English language dominates world publishing, very few translations except those from English to other languages will be commercially viable. As a result, virtually only those writing in English will have a chance of reaching a world audience and achieving ‘classic status’. The outcome is clear, Mélitz argues: just as in the sciences, those who wish to reach a world audience will write in English. “World literature will be an English literature”, Mélitz warns, “and will be the poorer for it – as if all music were written only for the cello”. His work appears in "English-Language Dominance, Literature and Welfare," (CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2055). By literature, he refers to imaginative works of an earlier vintage that are still read today, and therefore the accumulation of world literature refers to the tiny fraction of currently produced imaginative works which will eventually be regarded as ‘classics’. According to Mélitz, the tendency of competitive forces in the global publishing market to privilege the translation of English fiction and poetry into other languages for reading or listening enjoyment may damage the production of world literature and in this respect make us all worse off. Because English is so widely spoken, it has often been referred to as a "global language", the lingua franca of the modern era.[3] While English is not an official language in many countries, it is currently the language most often taught as a second language around the world. Some linguists believe that it is no longer the exclusive cultural sign of "native English speakers", but is rather a language that is absorbing aspects of cultures worldwide as it continues to grow. It is, by international treaty, the official language for aerial and maritime communications, as well as one of the official languages of the European Union, the United Nations, and most international athletic organisations, including the International Olympic Committee.English is the language most often studied as a foreign language in the European Union (by 89% of schoolchildren), followed by French (32%), German (18%), and Spanish (8%).[27] It is also the most studied in the People's Republic of China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.[citation needed]Books, magazines, and newspapers written in English are available in many countries around the world. English is also the most commonly used language in the sciences.[3] In 1997, the Science Citation Index reported that 95% of its articles were written in English, even though only half of them came from authors in English-speaking countries.Great authors write in only one language: Remarkably few people have ever made contributions to world literature in more than one language. Beckett and Nabokov may be the only two prominent examples. Conrad, who is sometimes mentioned in this connection, is a false illustration in a glaring regard: he never wrote in his native Polish. Quite conspicuously, expatriate authors generally continue to write in their native language even after living for decades away from home. This holds not only for poets, such as Mickiewicz and Milosz, which may not be surprising, but also for novelists. Mann went on composing in German during a long spell in the US. The list of authors who have inscribed their names in the history of literature in more than one language since the beginning of time is astonishingly short.If you want to reach a world audience, write in English: In science, as in literature, a person writing in a minor language has a better chance of publication than one writing in a major tongue, but will necessarily have a much smaller chance of translation and international recognition. The result in science is clear. Those who strive to make a mark in their discipline try to publish in English. By and large, the ones who stick to their home language – English excepted, of course – have lower ambitions and do less significant work. The same pressure to publish in English exists for those engaged in imaginative writing who wish to attain a world audienceAlong with the advances in telecommunications in the last thirty years, the dominance of English in auditory and audiovisual entertainment has become far greater than in books. Does the argument about translations in literature apply more generally and explain this wider ascension of English too? The answer is partly positive as regards television, but mostly negative in connection with the cinema. US television series indeed benefit from an unusually large home audience and only travel abroad when successful domestically. On the other hand, a film need not succeed in the home market before being made available to foreign-language cinema audiences. Hollywood achieved an important place in the cinema in the era of the silent film.